<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Marketing Keywords Within Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robmalon.com/search-marketing-keywords-within-keywords/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robmalon.com/search-marketing-keywords-within-keywords/</link>
	<description>Automate Websites For Passive Income - A Marketing &#38; Business Strategy Guide</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevon Edmonds</title>
		<link>http://robmalon.com/search-marketing-keywords-within-keywords/#comment-13012</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevon Edmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robmalon.com/search-marketing-keywords-within-keywords/#comment-13012</guid>
		<description>This idea goes both ways. The problem is that the term you are relying most on can be a very competitive term. It's important to look at the subterms within a keyword, but not to lose sight if they are overly competitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This idea goes both ways. The problem is that the term you are relying most on can be a very competitive term. It&#8217;s important to look at the subterms within a keyword, but not to lose sight if they are overly competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
